Lab Tribune Middle East & Africa No. 5, 2024
Current and future regenerative possibilities: A review of 3D bioprinting applications / 3D-printed surgical guides to facilitate internal sinus lift
Current and future regenerative possibilities: A review of 3D bioprinting applications / 3D-printed surgical guides to facilitate internal sinus lift
Array ( [post_data] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 91042 [post_author] => 0 [post_date] => 2024-11-12 10:10:16 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-11-11 08:59:46 [post_content] => [post_title] => Lab Tribune Middle East & Africa No. 5, 2024 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => lab-tribune-middle-east-africa-no-5-2024 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-18 16:41:12 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-18 16:41:12 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://e.dental-tribune.com/epaper/ltmea0524/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => epaper [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [id] => 91042 [id_hash] => 7cab457b31791fdc2eac01cf515c007b1ad25f5f40c810f48434e0f3c37037e5 [post_type] => epaper [post_date] => 2024-11-12 10:10:16 [fields] => Array ( [pdf] => Array ( [ID] => 91043 [id] => 91043 [title] => LTMEA0524.pdf [filename] => LTMEA0524.pdf [filesize] => 0 [url] => https://e.dental-tribune.com/wp-content/uploads/LTMEA0524.pdf [link] => https://e.dental-tribune.com/epaper/lab-tribune-middle-east-africa-no-5-2024/ltmea0524-pdf/ [alt] => [author] => 0 [description] => [caption] => [name] => ltmea0524-pdf [status] => inherit [uploaded_to] => 91042 [date] => 2024-12-18 16:41:06 [modified] => 2024-12-18 16:41:06 [menu_order] => 0 [mime_type] => application/pdf [type] => application [subtype] => pdf [icon] => https://e.dental-tribune.com/wp-includes/images/media/document.png ) [cf_issue_name] => Lab Tribune Middle East & Africa No.5, 2024 [cf_edition_number] => 0524 [publish_date] => 2024-11-12 10:10:16 [contents] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [from] => 1 [to] => 1 [title] => Current and future regenerative possibilities: A review of 3D bioprinting applications [description] => Current and future regenerative possibilities: A review of 3D bioprinting applications ) [1] => Array ( [from] => 2 [to] => 3 [title] => 3D-printed surgical guides to facilitate internal sinus lift [description] => 3D-printed surgical guides to facilitate internal sinus lift ) ) [seo_title] => [seo_description] => [seo_keywords] => [fb_title] => [fb_description] => ) [permalink] => https://e.dental-tribune.com/epaper/lab-tribune-middle-east-africa-no-5-2024/ [post_title] => Lab Tribune Middle East & Africa No. 5, 2024 [client] => [client_slug] => [pages_generated] => [pages] => Array ( [1] => Array ( [image_url] => Array ( [2000] => https://epaper-dental-tribune.s3.eu-central-1.amazonaws.com/91042-254468a8/2000/page-0.jpg [1000] => https://epaper-dental-tribune.s3.eu-central-1.amazonaws.com/91042-254468a8/1000/page-0.jpg [200] => https://epaper-dental-tribune.s3.eu-central-1.amazonaws.com/91042-254468a8/200/page-0.jpg ) [key] => Array ( [2000] => 91042-254468a8/2000/page-0.jpg [1000] => 91042-254468a8/1000/page-0.jpg [200] => 91042-254468a8/200/page-0.jpg ) [ads] => Array ( ) [html_content] => ) [2] => Array ( [image_url] => Array ( [2000] => https://epaper-dental-tribune.s3.eu-central-1.amazonaws.com/91042-254468a8/2000/page-1.jpg [1000] => https://epaper-dental-tribune.s3.eu-central-1.amazonaws.com/91042-254468a8/1000/page-1.jpg [200] => https://epaper-dental-tribune.s3.eu-central-1.amazonaws.com/91042-254468a8/200/page-1.jpg ) [key] => Array ( [2000] => 91042-254468a8/2000/page-1.jpg [1000] => 91042-254468a8/1000/page-1.jpg [200] => 91042-254468a8/200/page-1.jpg ) [ads] => Array ( ) [html_content] => ) [3] => Array ( [image_url] => Array ( [2000] => https://epaper-dental-tribune.s3.eu-central-1.amazonaws.com/91042-254468a8/2000/page-2.jpg [1000] => https://epaper-dental-tribune.s3.eu-central-1.amazonaws.com/91042-254468a8/1000/page-2.jpg [200] => https://epaper-dental-tribune.s3.eu-central-1.amazonaws.com/91042-254468a8/200/page-2.jpg ) [key] => Array ( [2000] => 91042-254468a8/2000/page-2.jpg [1000] => 91042-254468a8/1000/page-2.jpg [200] => 91042-254468a8/200/page-2.jpg ) [ads] => Array ( ) [html_content] => ) [4] => Array ( [image_url] => Array ( [2000] => https://epaper-dental-tribune.s3.eu-central-1.amazonaws.com/91042-254468a8/2000/page-3.jpg [1000] => https://epaper-dental-tribune.s3.eu-central-1.amazonaws.com/91042-254468a8/1000/page-3.jpg [200] => https://epaper-dental-tribune.s3.eu-central-1.amazonaws.com/91042-254468a8/200/page-3.jpg ) [key] => Array ( [2000] => 91042-254468a8/2000/page-3.jpg [1000] => 91042-254468a8/1000/page-3.jpg [200] => 91042-254468a8/200/page-3.jpg ) [ads] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [post_data] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 91044 [post_author] => 0 [post_date] => 2024-12-18 16:41:06 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-12-18 16:41:06 [post_content] => [post_title] => epaper-91042-page-4-ad-91044 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => epaper-91042-page-4-ad-91044 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-18 16:41:06 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-18 16:41:06 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://e.dental-tribune.com/ad/epaper-91042-page-4-ad/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => ad [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [id] => 91044 [id_hash] => dfcb9ef22366a4f7990cbc144fcf40c098718efb66419fbc37558f1617024356 [post_type] => ad [post_date] => 2024-12-18 16:41:06 [fields] => Array ( [url] => https://me.dental-tribune.com/c/capp/ [link] => URL ) [permalink] => https://e.dental-tribune.com/ad/epaper-91042-page-4-ad-91044/ [post_title] => epaper-91042-page-4-ad-91044 [post_status] => publish [position] => 0.27855153203343,0.1890359168242,99.442896935933,99.62193393527 [belongs_to_epaper] => 91042 [page] => 4 [cached] => false ) ) [html_content] =>) ) [pdf_filetime] => 1734540066 [s3_key] => 91042-254468a8 [pdf] => LTMEA0524.pdf [pdf_location_url] => https://e.dental-tribune.com/tmp/dental-tribune-com/91042/LTMEA0524.pdf [pdf_location_local] => /var/www/vhosts/e.dental-tribune.com/httpdocs/tmp/dental-tribune-com/91042/LTMEA0524.pdf [should_regen_pages] => 1 [pdf_url] => https://epaper-dental-tribune.s3.eu-central-1.amazonaws.com/91042-254468a8/epaper.pdf [pages_text] => Array ( [1] =>DTMEA_No.5. Vol.15_LT.indd PUBLISHED IN DUBAI www.dental-tribune.me Vol. 15, No. 5 Though it has had a slow start in dentistry, 3D bioprinting opens up a world of potential treatment options for dental patients. (Image: faahadkhan/Freepik) Current and future regenerative possibilities: A review of 3D bioprinting applications By Anisha Hall Hoppe, Dental Tribune International While the majority of dental clinicians are already familiar with the capabilities of 3D printing for producing models, appliances, surgical guides and more, the uses of bioprinting may be less familiar. A team with the Datta Meghe Institute of Higher Education and Research in India has published a review of the promising applications of bioprinting within dentistry, outlining the power of being able to create human tissue through cell deposition for enhanced reconstructive and regenerative treatment. 3D bioprinting is an advanced technique that integrates additive manufacturing with bioinks—composed of living cells and biomaterials—to create customised tissue constructs. These constructs are crucial for regenerating damaged tissue and restoring various maxillofacial abnormalities. The authors explore how this technology has gained increasing interest owing to its ability to precisely control the deposition of cells and materials, offering new possibilities in dentistry and beyond. Key components of 3D bioprinting include bioinks and scaffolds. Bioinks mimic the extracellular environment, and scaffolds provide the structural framework necessary for cell growth and tissue formation. Because 3D bioprinting creates scaffolds with uniform cell dispersion, the use of 3D-bioprinted materials allows for customisation to the desired dimensions and configuration of specific tissues. The process of 3D bioprinting involves three major stages: pre-printing, printing and post-printing. Pre-printing includes the design of the tissue model using CAD software, the printing stage involves creating the construct using a bioprinter and the post-printing stage focuses on the maturation, implantation and testing of the bioprinted tissue. The review covers various bioprinting techniques, including inkjet-based, extrusion-based and laser-assisted, each offering different approaches to achieving precise tissue constructs. For instance, ink- jet-based bioprinting uses ink droplets to localise cells accurately, whereas extrusion-based bioprinting utilises a continuous flow of bioink for larger constructs. Laser-assisted bioprinting offers high cell viability by using non-contact methods to print moderately viscous biological materials. When it comes to dentistry, some of the broader applications of 3D bioprinting include drug delivery systems, root coverage, socket preservation and maxillofacial prosthodontics. However, the list of potential applications is virtually endless, as the technology also shows promise in areas like periodontal repair and dental pulp regeneration. Furthermore, the advent of 4D bioprinting introduces smart scaffolds that can respond to stimuli, potentially revolutionising tissue engineering. Although progress in the application of 3D bioprinting, particularly in dentistry, has been slow, the potential for personalising treatments through architectural control and material versatility offers great promise for future developments. 3D bioprinting may even surpass conventional fabrication methods. The study, titled “Three-dimensional bioprinting as a tool for tissue engineering: A review”, was published online on 11 September 2024 in Journal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences, ahead of inclusion in an issue.[2] =>DTMEA_No.5. Vol.15_LT.indd CLINICAL CASE B2 Lab Tribune Middle East & Africa Edition | 5/2024 3D-printed surgical guides to facilitate internal sinus lift By Drs Andreas Keßler & Stefanie Lindner, Germany Introduction The possibility of replacing a tooth with a dental implant has considerably expanded the range of therapies in patients who are missing some or all of their natural teeth. Nowadays, osseointegration of the implant is highly pre dictable, and the appropriate position of the implant is primarily determined by the prosthetic requirements.1–4 The digitalisation of dentistry has fundamentally altered and revolutionised many traditional workflows. Digital pro- cess chains now make it possible to merge CBCT scans with surface data sets as well as to plan the optimal positioning of the implant virtually prior to surgery. Surgical guides are usually employed to transfer the virtually planned position of the implant to the clinical situation intraoperatively.5 Alongside conventional production by means of a subtractive process, the additive tech nique for the production of surgical guides is increasingly finding application. The most commonly used process in dentistry is stereolithography along with the technically related process of digital light processing (DLP).6 2 In addition to the positioning of the implants according to the prosthetic restoration, internal or external sinus lift can be planned in the CAD software and transferred with the aid of surgical guides. This can improve the preoper ative briefing of the patient, minimise the surgical risk and achieve a predictable result. The following case presents a corresponding workflow with a focus on the planning and 3D printing of the surgical guide. Case presentation A 56-year-old female patient presented to our outpatient depart- 1 Fig. 1: Before treatment. Provisional bridge from tooth #13 to tooth #16. 3a 3b Fig. 2: Merging of the DICOM volume data set with the STL surface data set. Figs. 3a & b: Alignment of the implants on the basis of the prosthetic restorations. 4 Fig. 4: Surgical guide aligned and furnished with supporting structures in the software. 5 6 ment with a Kennedy Class II, missing teeth #14 and 15, and requested closure of the gap. Her exist ing restoration was a provisional bridge from tooth #13 to tooth #16 (Fig. 1). The patient’s general medical his tory did not reveal any abnormalities. The patient was informed of the available treatment options, taking her general medical and dental history into consideration. In light of the patient’s request for a fixed denture, the options were a bridge from tooth #13 to tooth #16 or implants in regions #14 and 15 with subsequent crown restoration of the implants and tooth #16. Based on the integrity of tooth #13, the patient opted for an implant restoration. This was followed by comprehensive briefing on the clinical procedure and the taking of a CBCT scan and an impression of the situation. Treatment planning Preference should always be given to a CBCT scan with a small field of view (CS 9300, Carestream Dental; 5×5×5 cm, 78kV, 6.3 mA, 20 seconds). This makes it possible to reduce the patient’s exposure to radiation and achieve a smaller voxel size, which equates to a higher level of detail. A cotton roll is inserted in the buccal region for better matching of the DICOM and STL data sets via the soft tissue in the CAD software. The STL data set is obtained by means of an intraoral scanner or inlaboratory scanning of the plaster model. The prosthetic restorations were first designed in planning software (Implant Studio, 3Shape). The DICOM volume data set (from the CBCT scan) was then merged with the STL surface data set (from ► Page B3 7 Fig. 5: Surgical guide printed from V-Print SG. Fig. 6: Finished surgical guide after post-processing. Fig. 7: Surgical guide after the supporting structures had been detached, and the corresponding drilling sleeves before their insertion.[3] =>DTMEA_No.5. Vol.15_LT.indd CLINICAL CASE B3 Lab Tribune Middle East & Africa Edition | 05/2024 ◄ Page B2 the intraoral scan; Fig. 2), and the implants were aligned on the basis of the prosthetic restorations (Fig. 3). The vertical dimension in region #14 was 10.5 mm and decreased distally from 5 to 7 mm in region #15. Straumann Standard Plus implants were planned for region #14 (3.3×10.0 mm) and region #15 (4.3×8.0 mm). The use of implants of these lengths would require an internal sinus lift. In order to allow guided preparation of the osteotomy to just before the maxillary sinus and the Schneiderian membrane, implant #15 was moved coronally in the planning software and its length shortened. The planning was completed with the creation of the surgical guide and the corresponding drilling protocol. the surgical guide is performed automatically based on the material to be printed and the printer. In this case, we used the transparent 3Dprinting material VPrint SG (VOCO; Fig. 5) in combination with the D20 II DLP printer (Rapid Shape). Printing is followed by postprocessing, involving ultrasonic cleaning in iso propanol and light polymerising, to achieve the final material characteristics of the surgical guide (Fig. 6). Once the supporting structures have been detached, the corresponding drilling sleeves can be inserted into the surgical guide (Fig. 7). Sterilisation of surgical guides printed with VPrint SG is possible and recommended. The absolute dimensional stability of the surgical guide with the drilling 8 9 10 11 Fig. 8: After the mid-crestal incision before raising the mucoperiosteal flap. Fig. 9: Fully guided preparation being performed in accordance with the drilling protocol. Fig. 10: Insertion of bone substitute material. Fig. 11: Placement of the implants in regions #14 and 15. 12 Fig. 12: Post-op radiograph showing the implants in regions #14 and 15. 13 14 Fig. 13: Resorbable membrane and bone substitute material prior to wound closure. Fig. 14: Screw-retained final restorations. Production of the surgical guide Importing the STL surgical guide data set into the corresponding nesting software makes it possible to align the surgical guide and furnish it with supporting structures (Fig. 4). The slicing of sleeves inserted is guaranteed without restriction. Implantation After local anaesthesia, a midcrestal incision was per formed and a mucoperiosteal flap was raised (Fig. 8). The flap design should be chosen such that the flap will not affect the positioning of the surgical guide. The osseous situation corresponded to the CBCT findings of a buccally atrophied alveolar ridge. After pilot drilling, the fully guided preparation was performed in accordance with the drilling protocol (Fig. 9). The vertical drilling up to just before the maxillary sinus was controlled by the surgical guide. The cortical bone of the sinus floor could then be selectively fractured using osteotomes and the Schneiderian membrane lifted to 11 mm, and subse quently bone substitute material was inserted (BioOss, Geistlich; Fig. 10). After placement of the implants (Figs. 11 & 12), the buccal atrophy in regions #14 and 15 was reconstructed with bone substitute material and covered with a resorbable membrane (BioGide, Geistlich; Fig. 13). Salivaproof wound closure was performed using ePTFE suture material. The provisional bridge was modified at the base to create space in case of swelling and inserted with methacrylate based temporary luting material (Bifix Temp, VOCO). The screwretained final restorations were fabricated from a multilayered monolithic zirconia (DD cubeX2 ML, Dental Direkt; Fig. 14). Discussion Placement of an implant in a suboptimal position can have effects on the osseointegration, cleanability and function of the implant. In addition to aesthetic compro mises in the prosthetic restoration, an inadequate implant position may be associated with functional issues and an increased risk of periimplantitis.7,8 In order to achieve a prosthetically and biologically adequate implant position, surgical guides are used nowadays to transfer digital planning to reality. The ma terials used for the printing of surgical guides are usually methacrylatebased and differ in their properties, such as the modulus of elasticity. The precision of guided implant surgery is usually defined as the discrepancy between the planned and actual postoperative clinical position of the implant. Equally good results in trans fer precision have been obtained in studies with milled and printed guides in edentulous spaces such as in the presented case.9,10 Sterilisation at 135°C for 5 minutes had no significant effect on the material used.9 However, the surgical guide material and printer used did have a significant effect.9 In in vivo studies, deviations have been evaluated with implants placed with surgical guides and been found to be significantly below the deviations using freehand procedures.11 In addition to positioning, surgical guides facilitate the procedure for the surgeon, as demonstrated in this case. Corresponding planning allows guiding of the drill up to just before the maxillary sinus, allowing more efficient fracturing of the cortical bone of the maxillary sinus floor with an osteotome and lifting of the Schneiderian membrane. This shortens the overall duration of the surgery, making it more acceptable and pleasant for the patient. Editorial note: This article was first published in 3D printing international magazine of dental printing technology, Vol. 4, Issue 1/2024. Please scan the QR code for the list of references. Dr Andreas Keßler is a distinguished dentist and academic based in Munich in Germany. He completed his dentistry studies at LMU Munich in 2013, followed by a doctorate in 2014. Since then, he has been a research associate at LMU’s department of restorative dentistry and periodontics. In 2021, he attained a postdoctoral about qualification in additive manufacturing and thereby became authorised to lecture at LMU, earning the title of Privatdozent. He was appointed senior physician in 2022 and completed an MSc in prosthetics in the same year. Dr Keßler’s career reflects a dedication to advancing both clinical practice and dental research. He may be contacted at andreas.kessler@ med.uni-muenchen.de. Dr Stefanie Lindner is a dentist and researcher. She graduated from LMU Munich in Germany in 2016 and thereafter pursued practical experience as a dental intern in private practice in 2017. Since 2018, Dr Lindner has been a dedicated research associate at LMU’s department of restorative dentistry and periodontics. In 2019, she earned her doctorate, and in 2022, she completed an MSc in prosthetics, showcasing her commitment to advancing dentistry through research and practice. She can be contacted at stefanie.lindner@med. uni-muenchen.de.[4] =>DTMEA_No.5. Vol.15_LT.indd SAVE / THE / DATE 14-15 Nov 2025 Face-to-Face // Dubai // UAE www.cappmea.com // +97143476747) [page_count] => 4 [pdf_ping_data] => Array ( [page_count] => 4 [format] => PDF [width] => 808 [height] => 1191 [colorspace] => COLORSPACE_UNDEFINED ) [linked_companies] => Array ( [ids] => Array ( ) ) [cover_url] => [cover_three] => [cover] => [toc] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [title] => Current and future regenerative possibilities: A review of 3D bioprinting applications [page] => 1 ) [1] => Array ( [title] => 3D-printed surgical guides to facilitate internal sinus lift [page] => 2 ) ) [toc_html] =>[toc_titles] =>Table of contentsCurrent and future regenerative possibilities: A review of 3D bioprinting applications / 3D-printed surgical guides to facilitate internal sinus lift
[cached] => true )