Endo Tribune Middle East & Africa No.4, 2020
Torsional resistance of two nickel-titanium rotary instruments: A comparative study
Torsional resistance of two nickel-titanium rotary instruments: A comparative study
Array ( [post_data] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 80101 [post_author] => 0 [post_date] => 2020-08-10 22:10:25 [post_date_gmt] => 2020-08-10 22:10:25 [post_content] => [post_title] => Endo Tribune Middle East & Africa No.4, 2020 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => endo-tribune-middle-east-africa-no-4-2020 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-10-24 00:07:31 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-10-24 00:07:31 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://e.dental-tribune.com/epaper/etmea0420/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => epaper [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [id] => 80101 [id_hash] => be9ce4ef5f05eb4ca3706393b48037d5c050967efa832f59d0cbce079a2d3980 [post_type] => epaper [post_date] => 2020-08-10 22:10:25 [fields] => Array ( [pdf] => Array ( [ID] => 80102 [id] => 80102 [title] => ETMEA0420.pdf [filename] => ETMEA0420.pdf [filesize] => 0 [url] => https://e.dental-tribune.com/wp-content/uploads/ETMEA0420.pdf [link] => https://e.dental-tribune.com/epaper/endo-tribune-middle-east-africa-no-4-2020/etmea0420-pdf-2/ [alt] => [author] => 0 [description] => [caption] => [name] => etmea0420-pdf-2 [status] => inherit [uploaded_to] => 80101 [date] => 2024-10-24 00:07:24 [modified] => 2024-10-24 00:07:24 [menu_order] => 0 [mime_type] => application/pdf [type] => application [subtype] => pdf [icon] => https://e.dental-tribune.com/wp-includes/images/media/document.png ) [cf_issue_name] => ETMEA0420 [cf_edition_number] => 0420 [contents] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [from] => 01 [to] => 01 [title] => Torsional resistance of two nickel-titanium rotary instruments: A comparative study [description] => Torsional resistance of two nickel-titanium rotary instruments: A comparative study ) ) ) [permalink] => https://e.dental-tribune.com/epaper/endo-tribune-middle-east-africa-no-4-2020/ [post_title] => Endo Tribune Middle East & Africa No.4, 2020 [client] => [client_slug] => [pages_generated] => [pages] => Array ( [1] => Array ( [image_url] => Array ( [2000] => https://epaper-dental-tribune.s3.eu-central-1.amazonaws.com/80101-b658572e/2000/page-0.jpg [1000] => https://epaper-dental-tribune.s3.eu-central-1.amazonaws.com/80101-b658572e/1000/page-0.jpg [200] => https://epaper-dental-tribune.s3.eu-central-1.amazonaws.com/80101-b658572e/200/page-0.jpg ) [key] => Array ( [2000] => 80101-b658572e/2000/page-0.jpg [1000] => 80101-b658572e/1000/page-0.jpg [200] => 80101-b658572e/200/page-0.jpg ) [ads] => Array ( ) [html_content] => ) [2] => Array ( [image_url] => Array ( [2000] => https://epaper-dental-tribune.s3.eu-central-1.amazonaws.com/80101-b658572e/2000/page-1.jpg [1000] => https://epaper-dental-tribune.s3.eu-central-1.amazonaws.com/80101-b658572e/1000/page-1.jpg [200] => https://epaper-dental-tribune.s3.eu-central-1.amazonaws.com/80101-b658572e/200/page-1.jpg ) [key] => Array ( [2000] => 80101-b658572e/2000/page-1.jpg [1000] => 80101-b658572e/1000/page-1.jpg [200] => 80101-b658572e/200/page-1.jpg ) [ads] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [post_data] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 80103 [post_author] => 0 [post_date] => 2024-10-24 00:07:24 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-10-24 00:07:24 [post_content] => [post_title] => epaper-80101-page-2-ad-80103 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => epaper-80101-page-2-ad-80103 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-10-24 00:07:24 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-10-24 00:07:24 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://e.dental-tribune.com/ad/epaper-80101-page-2-ad/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => ad [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [id] => 80103 [id_hash] => daa0b9b49a3ef59175457e6dc86547d8f419ceafb21a5bc11ef8281f5ce8f63d [post_type] => ad [post_date] => 2024-10-24 00:07:24 [fields] => Array ( [url] => https://me.dental-tribune.com/c/dentsply-sirona-middle-east/ [link] => URL ) [permalink] => https://e.dental-tribune.com/ad/epaper-80101-page-2-ad-80103/ [post_title] => epaper-80101-page-2-ad-80103 [post_status] => publish [position] => 0.92807424593968,0.62992125984252,98.839907192575,99.055118110236 [belongs_to_epaper] => 80101 [page] => 2 [cached] => false ) ) [html_content] =>) ) [pdf_filetime] => 1729728444 [s3_key] => 80101-b658572e [pdf] => ETMEA0420.pdf [pdf_location_url] => https://e.dental-tribune.com/tmp/dental-tribune-com/80101/ETMEA0420.pdf [pdf_location_local] => /var/www/vhosts/e.dental-tribune.com/httpdocs/tmp/dental-tribune-com/80101/ETMEA0420.pdf [should_regen_pages] => 1 [pdf_url] => https://epaper-dental-tribune.s3.eu-central-1.amazonaws.com/80101-b658572e/epaper.pdf [pages_text] => Array ( [1] =>DTMEA_No.4. Vol.10_ET.indd NL Y O LS NA IO SS FE O PR NT AL DE www.dental-tribune.me PUBLISHED IN DUBAI July-August 2020 | No. 4, Vol. 10 Torsional resistance of two nickel-titanium rotary instruments: A comparative study By Prof. Gianluca Gambarini, Italy Introduction The main mechanisms of nickeltitanium (NiTi) endodontic instrument fracture have been revealed to be two modes of failure, one being torsional failure and the other cyclic fatigue. The former contributes to a significant pro- portion of failures.1 Cyclic fatigue fracture is caused by repetitive compressive and tensile stresses on the outermost fibres of a file rotating in a curved root canal, and torsional failure occurs when the tip of the instrument binds to the canal wall, even in a straight root canal.1 Cyclic fatigue resistance of NiTi instruments has been2 assessed extensively. In contrast, there is less information available on torsional fracture resistance tests. The main method of testing for static rotational fracture is the comparison of the torsional resistance of the instruments as described by ISO 3630-1. According to this specification, the last 3 mm of the file tip must be fixed with brass and a rotational speed of 2 rpm applied to create a continuous torsional load until fracture occurs.3 Torsional load can be limited during intra-canal rotary instrumentation by the torque-controlled endodontic motor: torque settings can be selected to prevent excessive torsional load on the instruments. It has been shown that the correct preset torque value for each instrument is very difficult to determine4. If too high (the same happens when the clinician applies maximum torque), safety becomes dependent on the clinician’s skill in avoiding over-engagement and/or blockage of the file. If too low, the rotary instrument will be loaded by repeated locking and release through use of the torque-controlled motor or auto-reverse function. How- ever, in narrow canals, where instruments are subject to higher torsional stresses than in wider canals, the chance of experiencing these repetitive torsional loads is increased. To this point, torque value at failure according to the ISO test has not been commonly used to determine torque settings in torque-controlled motors. In most cases, values are higher than torque at failure. As a consequence, the concept that the use of a preset torque value is considered safe (i.e. capable of preventing shear fracture of the instrument) is not completely accurate. Therefore, NiTi rotary instruments should ideally exhibit good resistance to torsion in all cases and in curved canals should also be flexible and resistant to cyclic fatigue. study File system Maximum torque at failure in Ncm Time to failure in seconds (mean ± SD) (mean ± SD) EdgeFile X7 0.57 (± 0.10) 0.42 (± 3.50) ProTaper Next 0.51 (± 0.10) 0.39 (± 2.90) | Table 1: Table 1:Results. Results mass, the more resistant to staticprocesses torsion the in- and 17/.04 factors instruments repetitive (alloys 5.5 Ncm.torThe torque values atrigid fail-andmanufacturing Many can were affectsubjected resistanceto a to 7, 8 strument sional test.including The test design, was performed a torqueIn the present mass and According dimensionsto the heatstudy, treatments). ure were recorded by the is. integrated to torsion, dimen- using were very and torsional resistanceEdgeFile too was X7 simicontrolled endodontic motor (MASTERsurg, Theof momanufacturer, files exsoftware the motor andsimilar analysed sions, manufacturing process and KaVo). 5 lar, showingThe no statistically significant difference between tor allowed recording of torque during the a higher flexibility and a greater using spreadsheet software. data hibit motion . Inprecise the present study, two values theone-way two instruments. null hypothesis was therefore instruments’ use. The accuracy andin reliability the de-using to cyclic fatigue than comwas of analysed analysis Theresistance NiTi rotary instruments, similar 6 vice had been validated a previous To perform of variance and arejected. Tukey test with a petitors’ instruments do. In stainlessdimension and design,inwere testedstudy. thecompare test, the apical 3 mm each file was firmly steel instruments, flexibility and signifisecured, cance level of a = 5%. to torque at of failure. The torsional are usually innull hypothesis was block that differences Hence, the present study showedresistance that heat treatment embedded in a resin produced with a mixed autoversely proportional. This isinmainly related to theresin different manufacturdoes not significantly influence torsional resistance, polymerising (DuraLay, Reliance Dental ManufacResults due to the mass and/or dimensions ing processes would found. contrast to the high increase in flexibility and fatigue returing). Each file was be then rotated clockwise at a speed Table 1 shows the results from the oftreatment the instruments. The greater the sistance derivedNext from heat as reported in many of 300 rpm until fracture occurred. The torque limitstudy. was The present ProTaper 9, 10 mass, the more rigid and resistant to published articles. set at 5.5 Ncm, to ensure recording measurements rangMethodology files demonstrated no significantly static torsion the instrument is.7,8 In ing from 0.1 to 5.5 Ncm. The torque values at failure were Instruments from the following different resistance in terms of maxthe present mass and recorded by thesystems integratedwere software of the imum motor and an- atEditorial A list of references is study, available from thedimentwo different tested torque failure note: compared sions were very similar and torsional alysed using spreadsheet software. The data was analpublisher. and compared: ProTaper Next with the EdgeFile X7 files (p < 0.05). ysed using one-way analysis variance and a Tukey test (Dentsply Maillefer) and of EdgeFile Similarly, no statistically significant resistance too was similar, showing with a significance level of = 5 %. X7 (EdgeEndo). For each system, ten differences were found between the no statistically significant difference 17/.04 instruments were subjected two instruments in terms of time to between the two instruments. The null hypothesis was therefore reResults to a repetitive torsional test. The failure (p < 0.05). jected. test was performed using a torque- Table 1 shows the results from(MASthe present study. The controlled endodontic motor Discussion Hence, the present study showed ProTaper Next files demonstrated no significantly difTERsurg, KaVo). The motor allowed The ISO torsional resistance static that heat treatment does not sigferent resistance terms of maximum at failure precise recordingin of torque values torque test was developed more than 50 nificantly influence torsional resistcompared with the EdgeFile X7 files (p < 0.05). Similarly, during the instruments’ use. The ac- years ago to test manual stainlessance, in contrast to the high increase no statistically significantof differences were found between curacy and reliability the device steel instruments and is probably in flexibility and fatigue resistance the two instruments terms of time to failure (p < 0.05). about had been validatedin in a previous not ideal for testing rotary instru- derived from heat treatment as restudy. To perform the test, the apical ments that rotate at speeds much 9,10 ported in many published articles. Discussion Gianluca Gambarini is head of 3mm of each file was firmly secured, higher than 2 rpm or for the spe- Prof. embedded in a resin block produced cific motors with torque control and endodontics and restorative dentistry at the Sapienza University of Rome in The ISO torsional staticrestest was developed with a mixed auto-resistance polymerising auto- reverse mode.5 Therefore, in more than 50 years ago to test manual stainless-steel inin (DuraLay, Reliance Dental Manu- the present study, torsional resist- Italy and director of the dental school’s struments and not rotated ideal for testing rotary inmaster of endodontics programme. He facturing). Eachisfiprobably le was then ance was assessed by using a differ- Editorial note: A list of references is strumentsat that rotateof at300 speeds than 2 rpm maintains a private practice limited to clockwise a speed rpmmuch until higher ent speed: the clinical one (300 rpm). available from the publisher. or for the specific motors with torque control and autofracture occurred. The torque limit The tested instruments were similar endodontics in Rome, where his focus 5 reverse mode. is on endodontic materials and clinical Therefore, in the present study, torsional was set at 5.5 Ncm, to ensure recordin dimension and design, but had resistance was assessed by using a different speed: the ing measurements rang- ing from 0.1 been produced through different endodontics. clinical one (300 rpm). The tested instruments were similar in dimension and design, but had been produced through different manufacturing processes (alloys and heat treatments). Ac- As an international lecturer and researcher, Gambarini has held more than 500 presentations at the world’s most renowned international congresses and universities. He has also received several awards and led research projects funded by national and About the author Prof. Gianluca Gambarini is head of endodontics and restorative dentistry at the Sapienza University of Rome in Italy and director of the dental school’s master of endodontics programme. He maintains a private practice limited to endodontics in Rome, where his focus is on endodontic materials and clinical endodontics. As an international lecturer and researcher, Gambarini has held more than 500 presentations at the world’s most renowned international congresses and universities. He has also received several awards and led research projects funded by national and international grants. In addition to that, Gambarini is an active consultant in the development of new technologies, surgical procedures and materials for root canal therapy. Furthermore, he holds patents concerning endodontic technologies he has developed. Currently, Gambarini serves as Chairman of the Clinical Practice Committee of the European Society of Endodontology.[2] =>DTMEA_No.4. Vol.10_ET.indd TruNatomy™ Orifice Modifier True, Natural, Anatomy TruNatomy™ Glider TruNatomy™ Prime Endodontic File • More space for debridement & debris extraction • Respect of the natural tooth anatomy • Preservation of tooth integrity while allowing for appropriate irrigation, disinfection and obturation TruNatomy™ Prime Absorbent Points TruNatomy™ Conform Fit Gutta-Percha Points For a truly smooth, controlled and efficient experience. TruNatomy™ Irrigation Needle dentsplysirona.com/trunatomy #trunatomy © 2019 Dentsply Sirona Inc. Rx Only. BDR / B EN TNMY ADV 000 / 00 / 2019 – created 01/2019 TruNatomy™) [page_count] => 2 [pdf_ping_data] => Array ( [page_count] => 2 [format] => PDF [width] => 808 [height] => 1191 [colorspace] => COLORSPACE_UNDEFINED ) [linked_companies] => Array ( [ids] => Array ( ) ) [cover_url] => [cover_three] => [cover] => [toc] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [title] => Torsional resistance of two nickel-titanium rotary instruments: A comparative study [page] => 01 ) ) [toc_html] =>[toc_titles] =>Table of contentsTorsional resistance of two nickel-titanium rotary instruments: A comparative study
[cached] => true )